Search

Gretchen Hall

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
74 matches · 29W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
60%
down to 3.0
40%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 37% down · 63% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.03. Higher than today’s 2.98 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
392 of 399
OR · 3.5
726 of 735

Gretchen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams45 teams · 2009–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gretchen has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.5201920202021202220252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Gretchen has gone from the 22nd to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
36.2%
21W–37L · 41% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-07-26 · Hall/Chapman-Zafer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Chapman
0.030below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · Hall/Chapman-Zafer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Chapman
+0.010about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · Hall/Chapman-Zafer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Schmidt
0.046below expectation — took 0% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-30 · Hall/Chapman-Zafer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Schmidt
0.030below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Kelley Aagesen / Lisa Huntchamps
2026-06-26 · WHRC-Nakatani · #3 Doubles · with Deborah Chapman
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Hall/Chapman-Zafer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Chapman
0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · WHRC-Nakatani · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Chapman
+0.027better than expected — took 41% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-30 · WHRC-Nakatani · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane King Ayers
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · WHRC-Nakatani · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather MacPherson
+0.018better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-26 · WHRC-Vangasse/Zagunis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Moore
0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · WHRC-Nakatani · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Chapman
0.011below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 4-2
L
2026-01-17 · WHRC-Nakatani · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Chapman
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.