← Search

Christine Moran

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
89 matches · 59W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.5
17 of 60
OR · 3.5
245 of 735

Christine is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christine has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Christine has gone from the 93rd to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 55% of games
7.0
85.7%
36W–6L · 64.1% of games
8.0
0%
0W–7L · 25.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Major
+0.009about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Diane Camp / Lynn Wagner
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McCarter
+0.012better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Kathy Schaub / Suzie Sarkisian
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Koenig
−0.009about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Koenig
−0.003below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Marilyn Bishop / Gwen van Meter
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Koenig
+0.032better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Major
−0.024below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Koenig
+0.019better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Bradford
−0.038below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Koenig
−0.047below expectation — took 57% of games against 71% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Koenig
−0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Noble
−0.018about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Skoog
−0.027below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.