Search

Jennifer Noble

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
64 matches · 43W–21L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.5
28 of 60
OR · 3.5
303 of 735

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams22 teams · 2016–2026
MPRC-Skoog/Noble
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MPRC-Lanier/Noble
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins 7.0
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
MPRC-Skoog/Noble
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MPRC-Lanier/Noble
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MPRC-Skoog/Noble
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jennifer has gone from the 62nd to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 63% of games
3.5
75%
30W–10L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
W
Celene Robert / Layla Gonzalez
2026-06-14 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilyn Sims
0.018below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lupine Swanson
0.006about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Schnadig
+0.039better than expected — took 63% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-05 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lupine Swanson
+0.024better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Eleanor Robertson / Colleen Carroll Sabo
2026-03-28 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Elliott
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jing Li
+0.012better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-03-07 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Moran
0.018about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilyn Sims
0.036below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Laurel Hallock Koppelman / Jenny Burnett
2026-01-04 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilyn Sims
+0.040better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-11-01 · MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Alfonso
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 23% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-11 · MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Alfonso
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-14 · MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Alfonso
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.