← Search

Ellen Hodges

VANCOUVER, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 45W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ellen Hodges to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-08-01 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Murray Jansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Hapke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-22 · SAC-Ko · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawn Boyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · VTC-Griffith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · VTC-Griffith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Winnie Woo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · SAC-Ko · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawn Boyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-11 · SAC-Ko · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nick Majmudar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-04 · VTC-Griffith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-28 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Elmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-25 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-01-17 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Elmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2025-11-16 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Boyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
29.4%
15W–36L · 41.6% of games
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.2% of games
7.0
25%
3W–9L · 46.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–7L · 31.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.8%
22W–25L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer