Search

Susan Gabe

PORTLAND, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
41 matches · 11W–30L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
PORTLAND · 3.5
11 of 17
OR · 3.5
307 of 735

Susan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Susan has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56% of games
4.0
8.3%
2W–22L · 32.1% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
L
Danica Lee / Monica Nguyen
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schwarz
0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Mary T. Palmer / Deborah Chapman
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Larsen
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Sara Gillespie / Amelia Ryan
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Parks
0.022below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Larsen
0.004about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Ossanna
0.010about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Melton
+0.057better than expected — took 92% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Lasocki
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Parks
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Anna Reutin / Mark Chenmixed
2025-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Yothers
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Yothers
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Yothers
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-05-18 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.