← Teams

PTC-Traylen

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.41 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Cathleen Lang
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Jamie Melton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Tiffany Bowie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Parish Burns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Kari Hastings
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.30
Ann Lasocki
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Kimberly Parks
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Jean Zuber Marshburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Caryn Crosthwait
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.09
Teufelin Traylen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Yone Akagi
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Cathleen Lang
67W–68L career
0%63%37%
3.57
3.5
Jamie Melton
31W–12L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Tiffany Bowie
93W–68L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Parish Burns
112W–58L career
0%98%2%
3.36
3.5
Kari Hastings
87W–75L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Ann Lasocki
21W–36L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Kimberly Parks
92W–90L career
1%98%0%
3.25
3.5
Jean Zuber Marshburn
83W–65L career
5%95%0%
3.17
3
Caryn Crosthwait
28W–14L career
0%55%45%
3.09
3.5
Teufelin Traylen
77W–65L career
12%88%0%
3.09
3
Yone Akagi
66W–52L career
0%97%3%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.