← Search

Gina Ossanna

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 33W–62L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Gina Ossanna to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-09-13 · LCC-Tait/Bowie · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Allers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · PTC-White · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · PTC-Bowie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-24 · PTC-White · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · PTC-Bowie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-04 · PTC-Bowie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Gabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · PTC-White · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-18 · PTC-White · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerilyn Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-27 · GLVR-Kanz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Mathews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-11 · CGM-Carrato/Cowling · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-15 · GLVR-Carrato · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-23 · GLVR-Carrato · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 54.3% of games
4.0
20%
6W–24L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#1 Singles
19%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Singles
13%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova