Search

Marie Picard

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
224 matches · 128W–96L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.54
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
29%
down to 3.5
71%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 17% down · 83% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.58. Higher than today’s 3.54 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
229 of 266
OR · 4.0
422 of 498

Marie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams136 teams · 2004–2026
WHRC-Grilley/Adcock
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2026
CAC-Delplato
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2026
CAC-Birkhofer
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Women
2026
MPRC-Cronk/Morris
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
N OR-MPRC-Cronk
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2025
MPRC-Cronk/Adcock
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marie has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Marie has gone from the 92nd to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
57.7%
30W–22L · 52.5% of games
4.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 44.6% of games
8.0
63%
34W–20L · 54.2% of games
9.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.7% of games
9.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history224 matches
L
Janet de Morgan / Janet Tabor
2026-05-08 · CAC-Birkhofer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Elliott
+0.008about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Julie Bradford / Julie Hansen
2026-05-05 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz DelPlato
+0.012better than expected — took 62% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-30 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Kralj
0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Julie Bradford / Julie Hansen
2026-04-23 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Goodfriend
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · CAC-Birkhofer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Elliott
0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Antoinette Ann Reno / Andrea Robertson
2026-03-21 · CAC-Delplato · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Kralj
+0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-20 · CAC-Delplato · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Crystal Bryant
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-01-10 · CAC-Delplato · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz DelPlato
0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Grilley
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Jones
+0.039better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-04 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
+0.009about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-27 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Jones
+0.015about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.