← Search

Marie Picard

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 128W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marie Picard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history224 matches
L
2026-05-08 · CAC-Birkhofer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Julie Bradford / Julie Hansen
2026-05-05 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz DelPlato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-30 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Kralj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Julie Bradford / Julie Hansen
2026-04-23 · CAC-Birkhofer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Goodfriend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · CAC-Birkhofer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · CAC-Delplato · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Kralj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-20 · CAC-Delplato · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Crystal Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-01-10 · CAC-Delplato · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz DelPlato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-15 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Grilley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-25 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-04 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-27 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams137 teams · 2004–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
57.7%
30W–22L · 52.5% of games
4.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 44.6% of games
8.0
63%
34W–20L · 54.2% of games
9.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.7% of games
9.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
46 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe