← Search

Pam Saftler

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 64W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pam Saftler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-05-24 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-28 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-14 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Torch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-07 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-15 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-23 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-18 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-03 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-22 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Herbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-09 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Pickard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-02 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Herbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-26 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Herbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.7% of games
4.0
52.5%
32W–29L · 50.2% of games
4.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 29.2% of games
7.0
100%
8W–0L · 69.5% of games
8.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.5% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
62 matches
#2 Singles
22%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King