← Search

Jessica Becker

Hillsboro, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
68 matches · 57W–11L · seasons 2025–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 44 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
1%
stay 3.5
99%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 22% stay · 78% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.56. Lower than today’s 3.69 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Hillsboro · 3.5
1 of 16
OR · 3.5
5 of 735

Jessica is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jessica has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jessica has gone from the 75th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
89.3%
25W–3L · 64.5% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 67.7% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 80.4% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 60.9% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 58.8% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
L
Lisa Kearns / Monica Nguyen
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miki Han
−0.038below expectation — took 40% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Nicola Baird / Marian Sy Shamon
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Clarke
+0.026better than expected — took 100% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Yaris
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Yaris
−0.020below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
5-7, 5-2
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Wenping Xue
+0.023better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles
+0.004better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Heike Droste
−0.010about as expected — took 53% of games against 58% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.012better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Lauren Johnson
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.006better than expected — took 80% of games against 72% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-24 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.041better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ramya Gotety
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.