← Teams

NOR-THPRD-Agrawal

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.41 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Debbie Spitzer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.49
Miki Han
usually #2 Singles 32%, also #2 Doubles 16% · published 3.5
3.48
Ying-Chieh Chen
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.48
Heike Droste
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Charlotte Clarke
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.41
Joan OByrne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Shweta Agrawal
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
3.34
Angie Urrutia
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.31
Amanda Yaris
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Wenping Xue
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3
3.13
Ramya Gotety
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Debbie Spitzer
143W–63L career
0%70%30%
3.54
3.5
Miki Han
56W–22L career
0%85%15%
3.49
3.5
Ying-Chieh Chen
45W–15L career
0%82%18%
3.48
3.5
Heike Droste
157W–91L career
0%86%14%
3.48
3.5
Charlotte Clarke
24W–7L career
0%86%14%
3.48
3.5
Joan OByrne
50W–19L career
0%88%12%
3.41
3
Shweta Agrawal
91W–36L career
0%1%99%
3.39
3.5
Angie Urrutia
72W–39L career
0%98%2%
3.34
3.5
Amanda Yaris
45W–21L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3
Wenping Xue
38W–11L career
0%40%60%
3.14
3.5
Ramya Gotety
35W–11L career
8%92%0%
3.13

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.