← Search

Genevieve Rollier

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 64W–13L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Genevieve Rollier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-13 · IRV-Martinez · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Naugler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Brooke Kuerbis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Brooke Kuerbis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · Good Vibes, Bad Lobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · Nolan/Towle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · Nolan/Towle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · Nolan/Towle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · Good Vibes, Bad Lobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Kuerbis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Good Vibes, Bad Lobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Dana Nolan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Kristen LaBarca championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 83.3% of games
3.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 63.8% of games
3.5
87%
20W–3L · 65.4% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 62% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
53 matches
#1 Singles
13%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe