← Search

Ashley Snieder

VANCOUVER, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
59 matches · 46W–13L · seasons 2025–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
10%
stay 3.5
90%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 52% stay · 48% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.50. Lower than today’s 3.60 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
VANCOUVER · 3.5
1 of 6
WA · 3.5
17 of 1209

Ashley is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ashley has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Ashley has gone from the 83rd to the 84th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
78.9%
15W–4L · 59.3% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 57.4% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 80% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 59.6% of games
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 69.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailee Higgins
+0.010about as expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailee Higgins
−0.060below expectation — took 53% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiera Hanrahan
−0.015below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailee Higgins
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Genevieve Rollier / Molly Moran
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clare Belott
−0.027below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marina Rubinshteyn
−0.016about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bailee Higgins
+0.032better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.029about as expected — took 86% of games against 84% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bailee Higgins
+0.024better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Weber
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bailee Higgins
−0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.