← Search

Jocelyn Smith

Camas, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 46W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jocelyn Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Kara Petracca championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Petracca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Petracca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Petracca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-04-19 · VTC-Griffith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Kjos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-13 · VTC-Griffith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Damiano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-03-22 · #1 Doubles · with Kara Petracca championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-03-21 · #1 Doubles · with Kara Petracca championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-02-28 · VTC-Griffith · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-02-22 · VTC-Griffith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy LaFrazia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 63.7% of games
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.9% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.2% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
47 matches
#1 Singles
13%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams