← Teams

VTC-Griffith

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Karen Pickering
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
—
Tammy LaFrazia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Dayna Porter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.18
Kieu Lam
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.08
Ericka Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
—
Nicole Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-05-25Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSamantha Williams / Kieu Lam vs Judi Babcock / Colleen Docktor6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEricka Nelson / Rebecca Griffith vs Starlyn Corley / Andrea Vicino6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha Damiano / Teresa Darling vs Loo Yah Leong / Laura Maginnis6-1, 6-3
2025-05-18Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKaren Pickering / Kieu Lam vs Kate Oliver / Erin Casey6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDayna Porter / Rebecca Griffith vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Ann Arp4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEricka Nelson / Tammy LaFrazia vs Kaie Wellman / Shawn Sefchick6-0, 6-3
2025-05-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Heidi Kjos vs Timothea Barnatan / Jamie Heberlein4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKieu Lam / Nicole Floyd vs Jian Xu / Susan Elmer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTeresa Darling / Samantha Damiano vs Toni Eastwood / Ellen Hodges6-3, 6-2
2025-05-03Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Geneva Newell vs Wendi Ouellette / Anh Nguyen6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTeresa Darling / Nicole Floyd vs Donna Walker / Megan McCarter6-2, 6-2
2025-04-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Karen Pickering vs Cathleen Lang / Lyudmila Leissler6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEricka Nelson / Samantha Damiano vs Gretchen Newcomb / Jeny Joseph6-4, 6-2
2025-04-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKaren Pickering / Dayna Porter vs Dory Simons / Julie Kim6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Jocelyn Smith vs Desiree Bliss / Christina McMenamin6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTeresa Darling / Samantha Damiano vs Tove Maloco / Rebecca van Sickle7-6, 6-2
2025-04-13Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSamantha Williams / Kieu Lam vs Amy Patton / Kristi Tompkins6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEricka Nelson / Dayna Porter vs Nancy Osborne / Jane King Ayers6-2, 6-3
2025-03-30Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Karen Pickering vs Mai-Anh Nguyen / Sloane Klonsky3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy LaFrazia / Dayna Porter vs Tomoko Hori / Helen Lee6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeresa Darling / Nicole Floyd vs Dolores Corley / Amanda Yaris6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Karen Pickering
156W–123L career
0%95%5%
3.42
3.5
Tammy LaFrazia
44W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Dayna Porter
81W–74L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Kieu Lam
45W–70L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3.5
Ericka Nelson
43W–59L career
17%83%0%
3.08
3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Nicole Floyd
35W–56L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.