Search

Heidi Kjos

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
189 matches · 74W–115L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 3.0
89%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.12. Higher than today’s 3.10 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.5
38 of 39
WA · 3.5
1104 of 1209

Heidi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams80 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Heidi has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Heidi has gone from the 3rd to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
14W–14L · 54.2% of games
3.5
29.4%
25W–60L · 43.1% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 36.7% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
73.9%
17W–6L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
32.3%
10W–21L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history189 matches
W
2026-07-03 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wei Pan
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · VTC-Griffith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Nieda
+0.022better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · VTC-Griffith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kieu Lam
+0.046better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-19 · VTC-Pluymers/Griffith · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Stuart
0.003below expectation — took 40% of games against 45% expected
1-6, 7-6
L
Kara Petracca / Emily James
2026-04-17 · VTC-Griffith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Sumpter
0.061below expectation — took 25% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-04 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ramon Tuason
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Janet Risako Ohno
2026-04-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.051below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Hapke
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 5-6
L
2026-03-29 · VTC-Griffith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Sumpter
0.016below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-20 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ramon Tuason
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 63% expected
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · VTC-Griffith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with RENEE VANDEGRIEND
0.047below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · VTC-Griffith · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.063better than expected — took 86% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.