Search

Julie Kafoury

Portland, OR
3.5A year-end 2025
47 matches · 41W–6L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
124 of 399
OR · 3.5
239 of 735

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams17 teams · 2016–2026
NOR-MAC-Lamprecht
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
N OR-MAC-Risch
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
MAC-Risch/Nearn
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
Bracelin/Heyworth
2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julie has gone from the 70th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
87%
20W–3L · 62.4% of games
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 66.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
W
Emily James / Lisa Provost
2026-05-17 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Cunningham
+0.054better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy MacColl
+0.028better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Vanderhoff
+0.016better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-07 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy MacColl
+0.024better than expected — took 68% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-02-20 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Holzman
+0.009better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-02-07 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Cunningham
+0.059better than expected — took 92% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Estelle Erhardt / Elizabeth Parkerchamps
2025-08-10 · N OR-MAC-Risch · #2 Doubles · with Meagan Lake
+0.010better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
AliceJane Brush / Jennifer Strelowchamps
2025-08-09 · N OR-MAC-Risch · #2 Doubles · with Meagan Lake
0.009about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Christina Spencer / Cassi Andersonchamps
2025-08-08 · N OR-MAC-Risch · #2 Doubles · with Meagan Lake
0.019below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-26 · N OR-MAC-Risch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
0.044below expectation — took 65% of games against 76% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Janet Risako Ohno / Natalie Fine
2025-04-06 · N OR-MAC-Risch · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meagan Lake
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Rachel Nies / Nancy Osborne
2025-03-09 · MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jacobs
+0.015better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.