← Search

Julie Kafoury

Portland, OR
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
47 matches · 41W–6L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Julie Kafoury to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-05-17 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy MacColl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Vanderhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-07 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy MacColl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-02-20 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Holzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-02-07 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Meagan Lake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Meagan Lake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Meagan Lake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-26 · N OR-MAC-Risch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Nearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-04-06 · N OR-MAC-Risch · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meagan Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-03-09 · MAC-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
87%
20W–3L · 62.4% of games
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 66.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert