← Search

AliceJane Brush

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
73 matches · 58W–15L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 3% stay · 97% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.15. Lower than today’s 3.31 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
1 of 104
WA · 3.0
4 of 1107

AliceJane is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

AliceJane has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, AliceJane has gone from the 96th to the 100th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 68.1% of games
3.0
100%
19W–0L · 73.6% of games
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.4% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 63.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
W
Molly Schmidt / Steve Stettermixed
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Brush
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Asha DSouza - *
−0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Chauntelle Johnson / Michael Johnsonmixed
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jared Oren
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Sarah Michael / Sean Michaelchamps
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Brush
−0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Matthew Korshin / Eleanor Morsechamps
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Brush
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Dustin Jensen / Vanessa Carlsonchamps
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Jared Oren
+0.039better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Howard Choder / Heather Curtismixed
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Brush
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Scott
+0.032better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Brush
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Bethany Haddad / Makena Barickman
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy King
−0.025below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
E-Ann Wang / Annie Chen
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy McCullough
+0.019better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Charlotte Niauw / Lisa Adamek
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy King
+0.019better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.