Search

Heather Curtis

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
117 matches · 70W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
4%
stay 3.0
96%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 37% stay · 63% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.03. Lower than today’s 3.14 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
16 of 144
WA · 3.0
56 of 755

Heather is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Heather has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Heather has gone from the 43rd to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
56.8%
21W–16L · 49% of games
6.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 51.9% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.9% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history117 matches
L
Guy Jang / Michelle Cowgermixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Isarankura
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Chris Pugh / Rina Adamsmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ted Kalmus
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Mihai Petriuc / Merri Baldwinmixed
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Sherr
+0.000about as expected — took 42% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
AliceJane Brush / Michael Brushmixed
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Howard Choder
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Sandrah MacK / Terri Nickless
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with DeeDee Schubert
+0.007better than expected — took 57% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Jane Selvig / Karen Spierling
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arianna Whitman
+0.019better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Kevin Chan / Lingqing Wangmixed
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Isarankura
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Blaikie
0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Heather Lewis / Joanna Hennessy
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terriko Somers
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Sarah Yoon / Jiarui Ge
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Grant
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Nancy Roma / Cheryl Borgonia
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Holt
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Combs
0.017below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.