Search

Colleen Blaikie

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
90 matches · 48W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.92
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
83%
stay 3.0
17%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.92 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
87 of 144
WA · 3.0
382 of 755

Colleen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Colleen has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Colleen has gone from the 29th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
61.4%
27W–17L · 53.5% of games
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 44% of games
6.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.1% of games
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Curtis
0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Linda Myhrvold / Brooke Krekel
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Kain
+0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Katie Misiewicz
2026-04-13 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.001about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
Teresa Engrav / Shirley Chow
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Joss
+0.019better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Schmid
+0.016better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 5-6
W
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bonnie Ziegler
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Heydt
+0.001about as expected — took 56% of games against 55% expected
5-7, 5-1
L
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brooke Gilbert
0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bonnie Ziegler
0.012about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Amy Friedman / Brenda Schlemlein
2025-09-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Lou
+0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Colleen Wurden / Youngmee Kim
2025-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Joss
+0.014about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Erika Springer / Sophia Cheng
2025-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wilke
+0.011better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.