Search

Jennifer Heydt

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
123 matches · 57W–66L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
70%
stay 3.0
30%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
74 of 144
WA · 3.0
324 of 755

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jennifer has gone from the 14th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 50.6% of games
3.0
45.3%
24W–29L · 49.3% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 42.2% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history123 matches
W
Aki Tameling / Mona Elsing
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Busby
0.011below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Camille Elliott / Linda Cowin
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Namchee Chan
+0.025better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Kimberly Caponigro / Stephen Damemixed
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Barbano
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Kryman
+0.013better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
Laura Walsh / Lindsay Terpstra
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Spade
0.037below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Walther
+0.003about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Christina Nelson / Annie Spalding
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin McMonigal
0.005about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Bauer
0.026below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Cooper
0.014below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Chau La / Haoshu Wang
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Bauer
+0.012better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Cooper
+0.041better than expected — took 38% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Rina Adams / Yuni Kwon
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin McMonigal
+0.027better than expected — took 54% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.