Search

Marybeth Alwood

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
115 matches · 39W–76L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
123 of 144
WA · 3.0
609 of 755

Marybeth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marybeth has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Marybeth has gone from the 18th to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.4% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
19.5%
8W–33L · 39.1% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.2% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
45.2%
14W–17L · 52% of games
8.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history115 matches
L
Cheryl Borgonia / Rebecca Zimmer
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Parrott
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
CECI BISSONNETTE / Chuan-Ling Yeh
2026-02-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Thompson
+0.005below expectation — took 14% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Nely Koralska / Xiaoyi Ye
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriela Beisel
0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Gilbert
+0.026better than expected — took 43% of games against 35% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Jill Walzer / Suzanne Kalberer
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jamie Rawding
0.015below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Draves
+0.037better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kitrina Bryant / Karen Walker
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Thompson
+0.008about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Isabelle Ochsner
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with Patricia Keegan
0.072below expectation — took 29% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Linda Mate
0.061below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Shelley Morrison
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Shelley Morrison
0.043below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.