Search

Lynne Parrott

SEATTLE, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 27W–57L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.04
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
33%
stay 3.0
67%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 76% stay · 24% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.04 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
181 of 755

Lynne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lynne has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lynne has gone from the 22nd to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 49.5% of games
3.5
24.5%
12W–37L · 41.6% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
W
Sonya Elliott / Julie Park
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Aleinikoff
0.004about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Cheryl Borgonia / Rebecca Zimmer
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marybeth Alwood
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Molly Schmidt / Priscilla Cypiot
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Snyder
+0.029better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
DONGMIN LIU / Rachel Wang
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie True
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Betsy Chamberlin / Bridget Haba
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Beaudry
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Bunny Rogan / Julie Dewittchamps
2025-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with Celia Evans
0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Corinna Huffaker / Alane Diehl
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Morrison
+0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celia Evans
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celia Evans
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Mei Ling Schenker / Wendy Walker
2025-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celia Evans
0.012about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Michelle Watson / Lauren Fisher
2025-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Weed
0.014below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Sommerville
+0.009about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.