← Search

Celia Evans

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 40W–20L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Celia Evans to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-09-13 · STC-Tightly Strung-Mulberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Mary Fitzgerald championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Christine Holm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · STC-Rodden · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · STC-Simply Smashing-Bouscaren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Battison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-15 · STC-Rodden · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-14 · STC-Simply Smashing-Bouscaren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Holm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · STC-Rodden · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · STC-Simply Smashing-Bouscaren · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barb Moe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · STC-Simply Smashing-Bouscaren · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lara Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · STC-Rodden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · STC-Simply Smashing-Bouscaren · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 57.9% of games
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.6% of games
6.0
100%
10W–0L · 73.8% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova