Search

Megan Slade

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
34 matches · 17W–17L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
230 of 342
WA · 3.5
923 of 1460

Megan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Megan has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 62.3% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history34 matches
W
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Davidson
0.045below expectation — took 55% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Holm
+0.040better than expected — took 35% of games against 26% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Nancy Chan / Gina Jaffe
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celia Evans
+0.053better than expected — took 45% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Helsell McIntyre
+0.042better than expected — took 100% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Bouscaren
0.031below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Melanie Gerard / Anu Ganesan
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celia Evans
+0.012better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Bouscaren
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Fitzgerald
+0.029better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Bouscaren
0.017below expectation — took 28% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Winfield
0.041below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-12-07 · #3 Doubles · with April Ancinas
0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
2024-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Weed
0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.