Search

Melanie Gerard

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
173 matches · 68W–105L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.15
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
3%
stay 3.0
97%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 37% stay · 63% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.03. Lower than today’s 3.15 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.0
2 of 17
WA · 3.0
54 of 755

Melanie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melanie has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Melanie has gone from the 29th to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
76%
19W–6L · 59.2% of games
3.5
36.9%
38W–65L · 43.6% of games
7.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.3% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
8W–20L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history173 matches
W
Rina Adams / Gough Chanmixed
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donald Gerard
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Laura Borner / Steve Pignottimixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nagendra Jammi
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Erin Kennedy / Mark Reudinkmixed
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donald Gerard
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Deborah Haislip / Ruby Lin
2026-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Mohanty
+0.068better than expected — took 100% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Siobhan Whitney / Todd Baldwinmixed
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nagendra Jammi
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Tami Mahler / Richard Marmixed
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Iyyappa Murugandi
+0.000better than expected — took 35% of games against 29% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Rhonda Bethurum / Nicole Jarjour
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Leahy
0.010about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Kimberly Miller / Jay Millermixed
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Iyyappa Murugandi
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Liesel Schilperoortchamps
2026-06-14 · #1 Singles
0.016below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.064better than expected — took 100% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Xiaoying Qiao
2026-05-29 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.024better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Anna Stock / Angela Patterson
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Jaquet
0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.