← Search

Nicole Jarjour

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
83 matches · 40W–43L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.01
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
45%
stay 3.0
55%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 83% stay · 17% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.01 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
74 of 252
WA · 3.0
278 of 1107

Nicole is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nicole has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Nicole has gone from the 28th to the 73rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
40%
4W–6L · 48.5% of games
3.0
50.8%
30W–29L · 49.4% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
W
Makeda Agonafer / Deborah Haislip
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Bethurum
+0.054better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Bethurum
−0.020below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Joy Page / Maria Costello
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Bethurum
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Bethurum
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Rosalind Kitikiatisak / Mindy Mignogna
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Bethurum
−0.034below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.019below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Kristin Bedard
2026-06-02 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.024below expectation — took 62% of games against 67% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-05-21 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.084better than expected — took 100% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Tammy Miller / Wendy van Den Smith
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Williams
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.031better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.024below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Catherine Cline
2026-04-28 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.