Search

Joy Page

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
82 matches · 44W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
59 of 63
WA · 3.0
650 of 755

Joy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joy has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Joy has gone from the 47th to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
61.2%
30W–19L · 50.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 46.1% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history82 matches
W
Deborah Haislip / Ruby Lin
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Sedghinasab
+0.068better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Rhonda Bethurum / Nicole Jarjour
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Costello
0.008below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Christy Srithongsuk / Alexis Wood
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Lampman
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Samantha Samulis / Joycelyn Su
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Bratton
0.020below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Klutznick
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Christopher Robertson / Karen Dixonmixed
2025-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Klutznick
+0.000below expectation — took 28% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Lily Ng / Martha Shefveland
2025-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
+0.019better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Whitaker
0.009below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee Sedghinasab
+0.010below expectation — took 8% of games against 18% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Cynthia Padilla / Gang Fengmixed
2024-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Hancock
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Dan Sun / Lacey Bliss
2024-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Mathers
+0.056better than expected — took 75% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Natalie Warner / Terri Hix
2024-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Lampman
0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.