← Search

Rick Hancock

KIRKLAND, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
98 matches · 59W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Rick sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Rick is one of 683 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 23% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rick has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Rick has gone from the 37th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
73.5%
36W–13L · 59.3% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 43.5% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 54.5% of games
6.0mixed
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
W
Kim Smith / Kevin McMahan
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Wilner
+0.018better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
−0.036below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Cynthia Padilla / Gang Fengmixed
2024-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joy Page
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Christopher Ma / Edward Almonte
2024-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Brown
−0.011about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2024-01-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Lin
+0.025better than expected — took 100% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Andy Stewart / Robert Logan
2024-01-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Holm
+0.030better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-01-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Holm
−0.015below expectation — took 52% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
C Todd Rentschler / Dina Apostoloumixed
2023-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katrina Fleming
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-11-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katrina Fleming
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Robert Sidbury / Joel Delman
2023-10-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brett Hartzell
+0.004below expectation — took 14% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Carl Miller / STEPHEN WAUGH
2023-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kurt Larson
+0.031better than expected — took 58% of games against 42% expected
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Hancock
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.