← Search

Kathryn Swingle

Shoreline, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 102W–65L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kathryn Swingle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-09-11 · HBSQ-Classic Hits-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barty Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Jeff Mcdowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Gettmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Mcdowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Mcdowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-03-07 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Matysik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-15 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barty Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-17 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gayle Burlinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-02 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Missi Huff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-09 · HBSQ-Classic Hits-Matysik/Swingle · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anna Matysik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-18 · HBSQ-Classic Hits-Matysik/Swingle · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.3%
47W–35L · 53.9% of games
6.0
69.6%
32W–14L · 56.5% of games
7.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.6% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#1 Singles
17%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova