← Search

Thomas Stave

Shoreline, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 40W–93L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Thomas Stave to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-09-12 · FC-Robertson/Mora · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nina Moorad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · FC-Mora/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Gonzales mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-01 · FC-Robertson-Mora · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Dalton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · FC-Mora/Robertson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Naomi Mora mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · FC-Robertson-Mora · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Naomi Mora mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-07-12 · FC-Mora/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Naomi Mora mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · FC-Mora/Robertson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Shively mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-09 · FC-Barber · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · FC-Barber · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · FC-Barber · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mario Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-05 · FC-Barber · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mario Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · FC-Barber · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mario Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.5% of games
3.0
17.9%
5W–23L · 37.1% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
6.0
38.5%
15W–24L · 45.1% of games
7.0
25%
5W–15L · 36.6% of games
6.0mixed
35.5%
11W–20L · 40.9% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams