Search

Seth Fulcher

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
68 matches · 31W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
205 of 256
WA · 3.5
923 of 1209

Seth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Seth has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Seth has gone from the 62nd to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.4% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 40.2% of games
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 54.7% of games
7.0
50%
14W–14L · 51.4% of games
8.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
L
Edward la Cava / Alan Mitchelchamps
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Honghue Hsu
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
David Baker / Thomas Stave
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Eggerman
0.016about as expected — took 80% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Eggerman
+0.074better than expected — took 86% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Mark Henninger / James Choi
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Honghue Hsu
+0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
AL King / Kim Henderson
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Carlson
+0.019better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Larry Bienenfeld / Steve Lang
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Eggerman
+0.014about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-6
L
Matt Gerrans / Maxton Chisepo
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shun Endo
0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Ryan Duffy / Alexander Moshchuk
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shun Endo
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shun Endo
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Mike Bursiek / Marshall Longtin
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shun Endo
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Raymond Attisha / Dean Martin
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Sefton
0.018below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Ra'Id Khalil / James Milton Smith
2025-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Chung
0.046below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.