Search

Edward la Cava

Woodinville, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
83 matches · 43W–40L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
56%
stay 3.5
44%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 87% stay · 13% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.41. Lower than today’s 3.49 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Woodinville · 3.5
2 of 13
WA · 3.5
104 of 1209

Edward is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Edward has gone from the 57th to the 98th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 61.9% of games
8.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 50.6% of games
9.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
W
Seth Fulcher / Honghue Hsuchamps
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Alan Mitchel
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Larry Bienenfeld / Vincent Yeechamps
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with Alan Mitchel
0.009about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Chapman
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
0.030below expectation — took 60% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Erik Gunvaldson / Mark Friedman
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
+0.052better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Paul Keller / Kamyar Nikzad
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
+0.019better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Walt Paulson / Mark Friedman
2026-04-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
+0.063better than expected — took 86% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Doug Bartholomew / James Milton Smith
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
+0.032better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
John Digenan / Cameron Buck
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick McGowan
+0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tod Wescott
0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shu Chen
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.