Search

Jim Coghlan

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
124 matches · 72W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.36
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
95%
stay 3.5
5%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.32. Lower than today’s 3.36 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
88 of 256
WA · 3.5
377 of 1209

Jim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jim has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920202025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Jim has gone from the 53rd to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 53% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.9% of games
7.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 59.9% of games
8.0
58%
29W–21L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with George Sampson
0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Clifford Hopps / Tony Shaheen
2026-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hal Blumberg
+0.005about as expected — took 60% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Ronald Mulberg / William Maloney
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Anderson
+0.029better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kamyar Nikzad / Michael Hastings
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Giordano
+0.043better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Peter Mason / Jan Dequit
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hal Blumberg
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Edward la Cava / Alan Mitchel
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Liner
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
John Cunningham / Mark Pavlovic
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Steve Ikeda / Mark Weiser
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Sampson
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Walt Paulson / Robert Shen
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Sampson
+0.043better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Vana
0.016about as expected — took 71% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
John Hynes / Bart Fite
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
0.036below expectation — took 43% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Mark Brown / Sean Kelly
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Huang
0.018below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.