← Search

Jim Coghlan

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 72W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Coghlan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with George Sampson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · HBSQ-Adee · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hal Blumberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · NWW-HBSQ-Coghlan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · HBSQ-Adee · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Giordano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Peter Mason / Jan Dequit
2026-05-13 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hal Blumberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · NWW-HBSQ-Coghlan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Sampson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-15 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Sampson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-09 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Vana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-08 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-10-26 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Huang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 53% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.9% of games
7.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 59.9% of games
8.0
58%
29W–21L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova