← Search

George Sampson

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 110W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add George Sampson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with Jim Coghlan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenny Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenny Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Coghlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-15 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Coghlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-18 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lynagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-10-12 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lynagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-09-27 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-19 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lynagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-05 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lynagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-03 · HBSQ-Adee · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Adee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 52.3% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games
7.0
73.1%
57W–21L · 59.7% of games
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe