Search

Jim Waters

Bothell, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
47 matches · 11W–36L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bothell · 3.5
24 of 41
WA · 3.5
584 of 1364

Jim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jim has been a steady 4.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Jim has gone from the 28th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
36%
9W–16L · 49% of games
8.0
5.6%
1W–17L · 33.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
L
Gary Pollastro / Matthew Rudolfchamps
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Bob Wyda
0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
Mike Price / Stephen Rising
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Honghue Hsu
+0.042better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Anil Patel / James Tursa
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Carlson
+0.043better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Randy Barber / Ray Santos
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Carlson
0.003about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Steve Eggerman
0.008below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sefton
0.015below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Carlson
+0.014better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 5-6
L
2025-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Weathers
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neil Price
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sefton
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
L
William Manson / Jon Woodbrook
2025-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Carlson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
L
Brian Peters / Bindu Purhar
2024-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Carlson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-7, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.