← Search

Peter Sefton

MONROE, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
158 matches · 83W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.42
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
85%
stay 3.5
15%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.42 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
249 of 1209

Peter is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Peter has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Peter has gone from the 40th to the 53rd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
58.1%
25W–18L · 53.2% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.8% of games
7.0
60%
39W–26L · 53% of games
8.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history158 matches
W
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with Steve Eggerman
+0.030better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Larry Bienenfeld / Vincent Yee
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Weathers
+0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
David McGinnis / Dan Morrison
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Cobb
−0.034below expectation — took 45% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Chris Lloyd / Daniel Murray
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Honghue Hsu
+0.048better than expected — took 50% of games against 32% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Dean Strong / William Manson
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Hammer
+0.046better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Hammer
−0.025below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Richard Bienenfeld / Donald Shifrin
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Hammer
−0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jinhong No / Kyuho Son
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alvin Sato
−0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Nate Hartman / Robert Sciranko
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bhupinder Cherra
−0.022below expectation — took 39% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Mike Merwin / Ryan Bussard
2026-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alvin Sato
−0.009about as expected — took 54% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Raymond Attisha / Dean Martin
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seth Fulcher
−0.018below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-01-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Odom
−0.005below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.