← Search

Dean Strong

Edmonds, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
59 matches · 22W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 3.5
12 of 20
WA · 3.5
854 of 1364

Dean is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dean has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Dean has gone from the 45th to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 50.3% of games
7.0
38%
19W–31L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
W
Mike Helbach / Mark Eshom
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Henninger
−0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
David Hasbrook / James Tursa
2026-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Henninger
+0.053better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Staehli
−0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Manson
−0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Woodbrook
−0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Giordano
+0.015better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Bertrand de Boutray / Paul Zemtzov
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Giordano
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Shiosaki
−0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Choi
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with STEPHEN WAUGH
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Choi
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Yves Mizrahi / Peter Mason
2025-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Staehli
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.