Search

Alan Draper

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
96 matches · 53W–43L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
122 of 256
WA · 3.5
508 of 1209

Alan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alan has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Alan has gone from the 77th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
56.9%
37W–28L · 52.6% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 31% of games
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
W
N/Amixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Harkins
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Luke Bienfang / Leigh Staddon-Smithmixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Holland
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam MacDuff
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Harkins
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Bhargava Vadapalli / Zhidong Yang
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lindburg
+0.025better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Eliezer Cabrera Marin / Ethan Stakoff
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lindburg
+0.032better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Rakesh Mallela
2026-05-22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Minas Ter-Galstyan
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.008better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chuck Kelley
0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Luc Do
2026-04-17 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.007about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Shuling Tang
2026-04-12 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Brendon Wu
2026-04-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.