Search

Ray Poletti

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
91 matches · 50W–41L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.77
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
126 of 144
WA · 3.0
616 of 755

Ray is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ray has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Ray has gone from the 78th to the 53rd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 62.6% of games
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 43.9% of games
7.0
59.6%
28W–19L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Zinck
+0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Yves Mizrahi / Michael Newman
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Zinck
+0.029better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Roy Higashi / Clifford Hopps
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Zinck
0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jim Muenz / Steve Carl
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Zinck
0.045below expectation — took 42% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
N/A
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Liner
+0.057better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lynagh
+0.002about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Steve Cissell / David Presba
2025-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with William Manson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-08-21 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ron Fredrickson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-0
W
Terry Dodd / Fred Aasheim
2025-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ron Fredrickson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-3
W
Fred Aasheim / Chuck Burns
2025-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Bruce Adee
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-0
W
Dean Strong / STEPHEN WAUGH
2025-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Zinck
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-3
W
Stevan Phillips / Wayne Kindsvogel
2025-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Zinck
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.