← Search

Steve Cissell

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 78W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Cissell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · with RICHARD NELSON championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · NWW-RBW-Dodd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Garold Jang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · NWW-RBW-Dodd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donald Shifrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-21 · NWW-RBW-Dodd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Letrondo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-22 · RBW-Legends-Dodd · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with David Presba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-15 · RBW-Legends-Dodd · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Donald Shifrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-07-25 · RBW-Legends-Dodd · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Tee Yokobe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-24 · RBW-Legends-Dodd · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Daniel Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-07-15 · RBW-Legends-Dodd · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Tee Yokobe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-11 · RBW-Legends-Dodd · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Daniel Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2025-06-11 · NWW-AYTC-Dodd · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-05-30 · AYTC-Ruffians 26-Dodd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Letrondo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.8% of games
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 56.1% of games
7.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 58.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer