Search

DAVID MATYAS

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
129 matches · 49W–80L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
62 of 63
WA · 3.0
702 of 755

DAVID is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

DAVID has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, DAVID has gone from the 27th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 63.4% of games
3.0
32.7%
16W–33L · 42.3% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
26.7%
8W–22L · 42.6% of games
6.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history129 matches
W
Terry Dodd / Garold Jangchamps
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · with Gary Western
0.045below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
1-6, 3-4
W
Steve Carl / Jeff Trager
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gary Western
+0.054better than expected — took 65% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Lik Wong / Nick Cilluffo
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Lowe
+0.012better than expected — took 48% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Drew Baldwin / John Carpenter
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hector Hernandez
+0.030better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Joe Zhou / Zachary Fu
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tee Yokobe
+0.022better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Chris Sbarbaro / Troy Johnson
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Heale
+0.024about as expected — took 25% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Duy Tran / Hy Mai
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ziran Lin
0.050below expectation — took 28% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tee Yokobe
0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Brad Smith / David Robinson
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ziran Lin
0.010below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
James Modie / Richard Seges
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Min Liu
0.015below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
William Manson / Yun Hong
2025-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Geoff Lieberman
+0.024about as expected — took 25% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Joseph Holmes / Carrie Holmesmixed
2025-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jo Gartenberg
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.