Search

James Modie

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
137 matches · 52W–85L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
124 of 144
WA · 3.0
612 of 755

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, James has gone from the 14th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
39.2%
38W–59L · 46.5% of games
6.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
9W–18L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history137 matches
L
Christopher Small / Thomas Walker
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Hasson
0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Joshua Carlos
2026-05-10 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jianfeng Zeng
2026-04-18 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Anirban Sengupta / Sushinder Kumar
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chen Hsu
0.045below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Steve Pignotti / Sergio Mir Arenas
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jef St de Lore
+0.008about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Timothy Snow / Kyuho Lee
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Hofler
0.006about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Changsung Moon / Yeong-Ung Yang
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jef St de Lore
0.035below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Douglas Gordon / Soma Burela
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chen Hsu
+0.015better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Drew Pounds / Patrick Headstrom
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jef St de Lore
+0.003about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
David Ou / Virak Bun
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Younes Nouri
0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jef St de Lore
0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Stephen Waltar / David Hasbrook
2025-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jef St de Lore
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.