← Search

Rohit Agarwal

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 54W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rohit Agarwal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-05-01 · RTC-Avengers-Ravi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Om Ravi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tim Flood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · RTC-Avengers-Ravi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Om Ravi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · RTC-Avengers-Ravi · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miroslav Doytchev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-27 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-03-15 · RBW-Avengers-Ravi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Om Ravi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-01 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Best
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-22 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yusuke Homma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-08 · RBW-Avengers-Ravi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Om Ravi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-01 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Ilvanakis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-3
W
2026-01-10 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Relyea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
71.4%
25W–10L · 61.4% of games
3.5
37%
20W–34L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#1 Singles
24%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer