Search

Michael Newman

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
79 matches · 30W–49L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.29
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
144 of 256
WA · 3.5
602 of 1209

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Michael has gone from the 16th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
22.6%
7W–24L · 40.9% of games
6.0
60%
9W–6L · 60.9% of games
7.0
32%
8W–17L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
W
Bill Houser / Steve Ikeda
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Murphy
+0.025better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yves Mizrahi
0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Audley Becker / Chris Steck
2025-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Murphy
+0.091better than expected — took 68% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Brett Hartzell / Ali Siahpush
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Rodin
0.013below expectation — took 54% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Ales Novak / Clement Ifrim
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry DeGroen
0.046below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Gaylord Escalona / Chris Sbarbaro
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bertrand de Boutray
+0.019better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Robert Suryan / Daniel Becker
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry DeGroen
+0.046better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Randy Barber / Albert Macrander
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Montgomery
0.009about as expected — took 44% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Ecke
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Jonathan Rhim / Kazu Takahashi
2025-09-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Montgomery
+0.017better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · with Kenneth Kodama
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with Thomas Lennon
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.