Search

STEPHEN WAUGH

Edmonds, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
48 matches · 25W–23L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 3.5
14 of 20
WA · 3.5
914 of 1364

STEPHEN is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

STEPHEN has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, STEPHEN has gone from the 32nd to the 46th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
Ron Atienza / Mike Price
2026-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Kearsley
+0.038better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Mark Eshom / Stephen Rising
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Woodbrook
0.010about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Kearsley
0.047below expectation — took 57% of games against 71% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Sherman
0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Bill Houser / Patrick Mason
2025-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Kearsley
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Robert Gascoigne / Douglas Elwell
2025-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Staehli
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dean Strong
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-3
L
Richard Bienenfeld / Steve Lang
2025-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Henninger
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-10-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerry Isen
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-3
L
Alexander Friedrich / Peter Mason
2024-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Henninger
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-4
W
Mark Brown / Scott Manning
2024-09-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Kearsley
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Staehli
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.