Search

Mark Eshom

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 28W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
136 of 144
WA · 3.0
677 of 755

Mark is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mark has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Mark has gone from the 18th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 38.6% of games
6.0
32%
8W–17L · 41.8% of games
7.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 38.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 50.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Dwyer
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Telsin Brower
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Paul Rose / Sandra Faucettmixed
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Telsin Brower
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Mark Henninger / Dean Strong
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Helbach
+0.013about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Barber
+0.013below expectation — took 14% of games against 22% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Jon Woodbrook / STEPHEN WAUGH
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Rising
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Gordon Kamisar / Terry Lundeen
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Rising
0.010below expectation — took 8% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Gary Western / Timothy Snow
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Gustafson
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Ian Brown / Chris Jones
2025-09-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Keith Wong
0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Ramon Calpe / Bao Truong
2025-09-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Keith Wong
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Proshat Parsimoghadam / Barry Chumixedchamps
2025-08-17 · #3 Doubles · with Christina Vanburen
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-3
L
Aniki Olson / Joshua Leemixedchamps
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Alice Lee
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.