Teams

FC-Barber

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-09vs HBSQ-Henninger/StrongLost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Stave / David Baker vs Jerry Isen / William Manson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMike Helbach / Mark Eshom vs Mark Henninger / Dean Strong1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRon Atienza / Mike Price vs Robin Kearsley / STEPHEN WAUGH2-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs NWW-MC-SatoLost 03
L#1 DoublesRandy Barber / Mark Eshom vs Frank Hammer / Frank Weathers2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Baker / Thomas Stave vs Steve Eggerman / Seth Fulcher2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMike Price / Stephen Rising vs Honghue Hsu / Jim Waters1-6, 1-6
2026-05-22vs HBSQ-Henninger/StrongLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Eshom / Stephen Rising vs Jon Woodbrook / STEPHEN WAUGH2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMario Hernandez / Mike Helbach vs Brian Nelson / Rich Schlachter6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBong SantoDomingo / Ron Atienza vs Nicholas Sherman / James Choi3-6, 3-6
2026-05-15vs BC-ClementeLost 03
L#1 DoublesMario Hernandez / Thomas Stave vs David McGinnis / Dan Morrison0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMark Eshom / Stephen Rising vs Gordon Kamisar / Terry Lundeen1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRandy Barber / Bong SantoDomingo vs Kurt Larson / James Tursa0-6, 4-6
2026-05-08vs RBW-Dodd 7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesRon Atienza / Bong SantoDomingo vs Warren Yasutake / Robert Coe0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMike Helbach / Mario Hernandez vs Larry Bienenfeld / Donald Shifrin2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRandy Barber / Ray Santos vs Terry Dodd / Vincent Yee5-7, 2-6
2026-05-05vs CAC/SL-Silverados-GascoigneLost 03
L#1 DoublesMario Hernandez / Thomas Stave vs Mariano Ortiz Jr / Mark Waldron4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRon Atienza / Mike Helbach vs AL King / Colin Bronemann4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCharles David Dizon / Mike Price vs Chris Lloyd / Daniel Murray0-6, 0-6
2026-05-01vs NWW-MC-SatoLost 03
L#1 DoublesMario Hernandez / Thomas Stave vs Stuart Cobb / Frank Weathers3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Barber / Ray Santos vs Jim Waters / Michael Carlson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRon Atienza / David Baker vs Honghue Hsu / Bob Wyda3-6, 1-6
2026-04-17vs BC-ClementeLost 12
W#1 DoublesMario Hernandez / Thomas Stave vs Garrett Mau / David McGinnis6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Baker / Ron Atienza vs David Hasbrook / Scott Manning3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMike Price / Charles David Dizon vs Clifford Weiss / James Tursa3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
David Baker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Bong SantoDomingo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Albert Macrander
published 3
2.85
Mario Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Charles David Dizon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Thomas Stave
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.63
Randy Barber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Mark Eshom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Stephen Rising
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.38
Ron Atienza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Mike Helbach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Price
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ray Santos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Stave + Mark Eshom3440% gamesnot enough data
Mario Hernandez + Thomas Stave1442% gamesnot enough data
Randy Barber + Albert Macrander3255% gamesnot enough data
Charles David Dizon + Mike Price033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Eshom + Ron Atienza033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Baker
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Bong SantoDomingo
17W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Albert Macrander
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Mario Hernandez
16W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Charles David Dizon
13W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Thomas Stave
40W–92L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Randy Barber
25W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Mark Eshom
31W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Stephen Rising
8W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Ron Atienza
9W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.38
Mike Helbach
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Price
2W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Santos
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.