← Search

Robin Kearsley

Edmonds, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
144 matches · 72W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 3.5
14 of 16
WA · 3.5
909 of 1209

Robin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Robin has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Robin has gone from the 28th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 45.4% of games
7.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 46.9% of games
8.0
61%
25W–16L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history144 matches
W
Ron Atienza / Mike Price
2026-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with STEPHEN WAUGH
+0.059better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Manson
+0.052better than expected — took 100% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Larry Bienenfeld / Vincent Yee
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Staehli
−0.077below expectation — took 8% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with STEPHEN WAUGH
−0.030below expectation — took 57% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Steve Lang / Bill Dow
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Giordano
−0.006below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Gaylord Escalona / Chris Sbarbaro
2025-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Giordano
−0.012below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Miaomiao Zhang / Yao Yaomixed
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Youngji Kim / Ryan Parkmixed
2025-09-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alina Stanciu
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Steve Hsiao / Sue Lee-Chanmixed
2025-07-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Bill Houser / Patrick Mason
2025-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with STEPHEN WAUGH
+0.022better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Choi
−0.013below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.