Search

Nicholas Giordano

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
63 matches · 32W–31L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
87%
stay 3.5
13%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
52 of 311
WA · 3.5
252 of 1364

Nicholas is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Nicholas has gone from the 64th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
10W–0L · 76.6% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 39% of games
7.0
45.2%
19W–23L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gordon Williams
+0.009better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gordon Williams
+0.024better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Kamyar Nikzad / Michael Hastings
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Coghlan
+0.041better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gordon Williams
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Doug Bartholomew / Peter Mason
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Adee
0.014below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gordon Williams
+0.041better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Choi
+0.035better than expected — took 50% of games against 36% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Steve Lang / Bill Dow
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Kearsley
0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Kearsley
0.017below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carl Miller
0.020below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Xiaoyi Ye / Ximeng Jiamixed
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mandi Counter
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dean Strong
+0.015better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.